Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dub Piece

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete --Pilotguy ^{(roger that)} 15:11, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dub Piece

I'm nominating this article, Dub Piece, for deletion on the grounds that it is non-notable. Specifically, I'm mentioning WP:WEB, and that it meets none of the three criteria. Aside from the hits on YouTube, there is nothing, in my opinion, that makes this article notable enough to have more than a passing mention in the One Piece article. HawkerTyphoon 02:49, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, as per my reasons above. HawkerTyphoon
• I think this might quilify for Speedy Delete. WP:NOT and ad service. -- Shane ^{(talk/contrib)} 03:03, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nonnotable (39 unique Ghits for "Dub Piece" youtube). NawlinWiki 03:09, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• I think this is more suitable for One Piece-related wikis, but after a bit of thinking, I have to say that this isn't for Wikipedia at all. --UNKNOWNFILE 03:31, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. —C.Fred (talk) 03:32, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. It fails WP:WEB, but, more importantly (in my eyes at least), fails Wikipedia is not a free hosting service and Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. The author is arguing that 20,000 hits on YouTube makes their video notable. It really doesn't, that's actually quite normal. Alphachimp ^talk 03:39, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, as per HawkerTyphoon's nomination. --Charlesknight 07:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:36, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete The Gecko 11:49, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- TheFarix (Talk) 13:03, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.