Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drunk fetish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Dakota 21:39, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Drunk fetish

An unrecognised fetish, which produces 500 or so NSFW ghits [1] almost all of which are the phrase embedded in porn sites. No verifiable evidence that this actually exists beyond a few pornmongers. Eusebeus 10:38, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Per nom James68 11:53, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Nothing implausible about it, but there are no references provided in the article which show its discussion in reliable and verifiable sources, beyind blogs or websites.Edison 17:06, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I have come across pornographic stories that employ this fetish (while pursuing my own different "interests") along with others. The fact that there are pornsites catering to the fetish would indicate that there are those with the fetish willing to pay for material of interest to them. Robovski 23:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment there are porn sites for every fetish under the sun having a porn site dedicated to the fetish doesn't imply notability. Whispering 23:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete — not sourced, per nom. JoeSmack ^Talk(p-review!) 01:28, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Only 500 Ghits for a sex-related search? That's gotta be some kind of record for nonnotability. Agree that this is a completely plausable fetish, but WP:V and WP:RS are official policy, and neither has been satisfied here. ergot 17:20, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable! Anomo 09:19, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.