Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drew Pickles
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS (4 delete and redirect "per nom" and 3 keep), defaulting to keep. Be bold and merge/redirect if you see fit. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 10:22, Dec. 17, 2005
[edit] Drew Pickles
Minor character in Rugrats. There's not a lot that can be said about him that couldn't be said in the Rugrats article. Delete and redirect to Rugrats. Billpg 22:05, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep out of the main rugrats article. Drew Pickles is an important character and deserves his own page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.19.72.207 (talk • contribs) 20:05, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect - per nom. B.Wind 02:03, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep out of the main rugrats article. Kappa 12:09, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
- Could I ask for some clarification of your reasoning please? Your comment appears to be more to do with the content of the Rugrats article. Or maybe I'm just thick. --Billpg 19:05, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
- This is a recurring character in a popular fictional universe. It is of interest to large numbers of fans of the show, so it should be included in wikipedia, but it is not of interest to general readers, so it should not be in the main Rugrats article. It should be in a separate of article of its own, or failing that merged into a List of minor Rugrats characters or similar. Kappa 19:39, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks. --Billpg 21:00, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
- This is a recurring character in a popular fictional universe. It is of interest to large numbers of fans of the show, so it should be included in wikipedia, but it is not of interest to general readers, so it should not be in the main Rugrats article. It should be in a separate of article of its own, or failing that merged into a List of minor Rugrats characters or similar. Kappa 19:39, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
- Could I ask for some clarification of your reasoning please? Your comment appears to be more to do with the content of the Rugrats article. Or maybe I'm just thick. --Billpg 19:05, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect per nom. Stifle 00:36, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep per Kappa. -- JJay 18:00, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect per nom. Eusebeus 17:25, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
