Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drepandrikidae
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 01:51, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Drepandrikidae
Hoax? No sources cited, and no google hits for Drepandrikidae. There do not seem to be google hits for the linked subspecies, such as Mialoa or Sczoloa, so they should be deleted too if this family article is deleted. Thue | talk 18:59, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- Child articles:
shoy (words words) 23:54, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:V. --Brewcrewer (talk) 19:41, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, this is weird, it looks like a walled garden, but the author has created other good articles. No hits for "Drepandrikidae" on the website the author usually cites [1]. shoy (words words) 20:24, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as unverifiable. If there's evidence or sources to support the existence of these species, I cannot find it. ZZ Claims ~ Evidence 20:45, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per others in this discussion :-) Stwalkerster talk 22:02, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as per above comments. RMHED (talk) 23:28, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. It is further worth noting that if these species really had existed, the majority had been named by people without knowledge of even the most basic rules involved in naming taxa (such as species). Notice the "interesting" endings to several of the scientific names (cf. ICZN, especially articles 11, 30, etc, or even the summary - available here)! Rabo3 (talk) 05:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:V. -- ¿Amar៛Talk to me/My edits 07:05, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete see also Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Birds#AfD - author has been blocked. Shyamal (talk) 10:24, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.