Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreamscape (dream)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was transwiki and keep. --Ezeu 22:42, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dreamscape (dream)

Not sure if AfD is the right place for this, but I think there are three options with this one: delete as neologism, transwiki and delete, or (merge and) redirect to lucid dreaming (see comment on article's talk page). TheProject 21:03, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Dreamscape psychology turns up 42,400 Google hits, most of which seem to use the word as it is used here. I think we can go beyond a dicdef with this one, so there's no need for a transwiki (though it is currently a dicdef). —Cuiviénen (talk•contribs), Sunday, 7 May 2006 @ 21:14 UTC
  • Comment: of course, it just occurred to me that we could transwiki and expand as well. TheProject 21:17, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment: it seems to me that if the article is kept, then it should be transwikied to Wiktionary as well, as it can be made into a dicdef, so I'll do that. TheProject 03:30, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
      • Update: I was bold and did just that. It is still a dicdef worthy of Wiktionary, even if we vote to keep it. TheProject 04:34, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep meets standards. ---|Newyorktimescrossword 02:26, 8 May 2006 (UTC)|
  • Comment: what standards, exactly? Stifle (talk) 14:42, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki to Wiktionary per WP:WINAD. Stifle (talk) 14:42, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki to Wiktionary --Zoz (t) 21:38, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.