Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dread Central

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete - spam. DS 14:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dread Central

Text from the article: "Dread Central is scheduled to be unveiled on July 4, 2006 as a web portal for horror entertainment." I can't do any better than that. BigDT 01:39, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, advertising. -- Earle Martin [^t/_c] 01:42, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete it does not meet WP:WEB and the whole crystal ball thing... --Gay Cdn 01:50, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete scrying, future non-notable sites are beginning to annoy me. SM247^{My Talk} 02:48, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all above. Maybe there should be a speedy criteria for websites that make no assertion of notability, not just people, bands etc. Paddles ^T_C 03:22, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as cruft. Fails all the basic checks. Pascal.Tesson 05:27, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, fails WP:WEB. I hope this isn't another Eon8. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 05:49, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete under A3. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-07-02 09:22Z
• Speedy delete fails pretty well everything. -- Alias Flood 16:40, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Zos 23:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as the web site is up now, and guess what? It's non-notable. --Aguerriero (talk) 19:40, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.