Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragonfly CMS (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. east.718 at 00:15, December 26, 2007

[edit] Dragonfly CMS

AfDs for this article:
Articles for deletion/Dragonfly CMS Articles for deletion/Dragonfly CMS (2nd nomination)
Dragonfly CMS (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Speedily deleted article was restored because a previous AfD ended in Keep. No visible improvement since then. Procedural nomination, I have no opinion ~ trialsanderrors (talk) 17:00, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete, notability not established in the article, no sources given. Cirt (talk) 17:24, 20 December 2007 (UTC).
  • Delete fails WP:N and WP:V Mr Senseless (talk) 17:43, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable software. -- Mikeblas (talk) 17:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 19:16, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. I've noticed something lately, if you start an AFD cause it "doesn't establish notability", shouldn't you try your hardest to prove your point that it isn't notable? Or even better, why judge if an article should be deleted just by that revision alone? We can ADD sources, ADD notability. ViperSnake151 20:39, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
    • No, that's the point. If something isn't notable, you can't add notability. If sources don't exist, you can't add them. And - in the case of this - if the result of the DRV is to send it to AfD, it must be sent to AfD. --SmashvilleBONK! 21:28, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Nn software. Fails WP:N. STORMTRACKER 94 22:18, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep WP:N doesnt fail anymore Chris963 (talk) 09:17, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.