Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragonfable (Second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete as a reposted article (WP:CSD#G4) Tonywalton  | Talk 11:27, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dragonfable

Dragonfable (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Apparently recreated after a previous deletion. Re-listed from here Djcartwright 06:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete as repost. So tagged. MER-C 06:08, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as a repost, and protect against recreation. Fabricationary 06:27, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep good enough for an article. I don't agree with its previous deletion anyways. Canadianshoper 07:48, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Then take it to WP:DRV. "Good enough for an article" is not sufficient reason to overturn an AfD. Danny Lilithborne 11:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep because this game really should be an article, once over 23k people played this. This should be an article.--Gravity^Talk 09:36, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Seriously, there shouldn't have even been a discussion. Danny Lilithborne 11:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.