Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draenor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 14:33, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Draenor

Draenor (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This fictional planet is just full of plot summaries and unnotable fancruft.

The article is unnotable to people who do not play the game. WP:CRUFT applies. This is not a plot summary area it is an encyclopedia. Bbwlover 02:31, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Bbwlover 02:31, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete: It is cruft. So, if it is important to the game, then merge it there. If it isn't, just delete it. - Rjd0060 04:27, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - The article has nothing in it because of its lack of notability. -- Judgesurreal777 (talk) 19:59, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, sufficiently long to warrant a separate article. Everyking (talk) 23:47, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Being fictional, containing plot summary, and having fancruft are not valid reasons for deletion according to actual policies and guidelines. And whether or not the nominator has any interest in the article has nothing to do with it's being notable. Edward321 (talk) 03:01, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletions. --Gavin Collins (talk) 10:07, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as this fictional world has no reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability outside of the Warcraft canon. --Gavin Collins (talk) 10:07, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep A very important part of the Warcraft universe, with the Warcraft games being very notable. CRUFT is not a valid reason for deletion. There is too much in this article to merge without either losing important information or bloating another article past reason, so I'd oppose a merge as well. -- Atamasama 18:33, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
• Weak (Very Weak) Delete The Article in question could stand a massive clean up and could be made to conform to Wikipedia Standards but as it stands right now it is not encyclopedic. I also agree however that merging this article would be determental to other warcraft related articles. Æon ^{Insanity Now!} 23:05, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.