Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dracomancy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 00:36, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Dracomancy

Nonsence / original research, unsourced save for a single unrelated link. Flyboy Will 21:24, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, as it really is nonsense. --Thephotoman 21:40, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Well, it's not {{nonsense}} enough to speedy, it's actually quite easy to understand. But it's also bollocks, so delete. Jamie ^{(talk/contribs)} 22:06, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. All this appears a part of the User:KoL's effort to create some sort of occultist webpage. Exhibit A; Exhibit B. Flyboy Will 22:24, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Weak delete per nom. Stifle 23:47, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.