Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Chris Wilcox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Deletion review nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:23, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Dr Chris Wilcox
Delete. Can't find cited paper at the CERN website given in link; can't find record of a Wilcox working at CERN. See also Gravitational Oscillating Plane Theory, which seems to be a hoax article. The author, a new User:Lithium412, has apparently been vandalizing pages. ---CH (talk) 03:14, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Not in Google Scholar either. Dlyons493 Talk 19:21, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Do Not Delete I am a technician at CERN and have personally verified the authenticity of Professor Vincent and indeed Dr Wilcox, who is a personal friend. I can catagorically state that gravitational oscillating plane theory is GENUINE, although the article here is not the most accurate. I have to say, by even questioning the validity of work by these distingushed scientists you should all be thoroughly ashamed of yourselves. And please do not vandalise this site. If you have any questions, please contact me at the usual address. --Svenson 22:02, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- Well, Svenson might not be an entirely unbiased contributor to this AfD. Transparent hoax, say I.---CH (talk) 09:21, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Comment This page was vandalised by User:86.9.0.194 who changed the votes of other persons and then User:212.139.49.239 corrected some spelling errors in another person's vote. I have therefore rolled back to the 09:22, 18 October 2005 Hillman version. chowells 20:37, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as per CH . -- Corvus 23:42, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --JJay 00:57, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per CH. chowells 01:19, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.