Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Watson's revolver

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Peacent 03:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dr. Watson's revolver

Dr. Watson's revolver (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete - Wikipedia is not for original research. Article has been tagged for a year for sourcing and none has been forthcoming. Otto4711 04:03, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - it's basically a collection of speculation about what gun he used. It doesn't appear to be a notable, or sourcable question. --Haemo 04:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Any verifiable information can be reintroduced in the main article once it is verified (and considered notable enough for inclusion.) Writing on the page appears to weasel it's statements by using inexact sources (e.g. others.) --206.248.133.41 04:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Were there a Sherlock Holmes wiki - say, "Wikiteria Lodge" - this might qualify under Sherlockian studies, but I can't see how it's notable enough for Wikipedia. --Charlene 04:29, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, original research. Groupthink 04:35, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - lacks sources and is definatly original research. XAndreWx 05:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per Andrew - G1ggy Talk/Contribs 05:27, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as original research. It even says it is research on the talk page. Turlo Lomon 08:20, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Seems like "fanspew:" loyal fans want to create articles about every microscopic fragment of cruft mentioned in his favorite fiction, cartoon, videogame, movie, TV program, novels or whatever. Lacks sourcing. Edison 14:36, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Good grief, kill this cruft. Doczilla 09:39, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.