Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Steve Allday

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep Spartaz Humbug! 21:02, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dr. Steve Allday

Dr. Steve Allday (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

There is nothing in the article to suggest notability. —G716 <T·C> 01:53, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete. Google shows that the good doctor is the developer of 'LubriSyn', but there doesn't seem to be any media content that would establish that this is a notable achievement. As such I don't think he meets WP:BIO. Nasica (talk) 09:36, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete If he was a renowned doctor, there should be references to some books or articles he wrote to establish his notability in the profession. There is none. Secondly, the user who created this article edited only on Steven Alllday, which may imply some minor spamming: [1] Artene50 (talk) 10:30, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. An article in The Blood-Horse says "Steve Allday has the reputation as the best diagnostic vet in the country." See Google News archive for more articles in reliable sources which tend to establish notability. --Eastmain (talk) 22:55, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment Yes some articles do call the doctor as one of the best vets. This google search on him suggests he is fairly newsworthy: [2] So, I'll change my opinion to No Opinion. Artene50 (talk) 00:32, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep but Move sources found establish notability but I believe the MOS says not to use titles in their names so it should be moved to Steve Allday if/when kept. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 20:56, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
ETA not MOS but Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people), knew I'd seen it TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 20:57, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment - based on comments above, and added sources in the article I withdraw my nomination for deletion. Regards—G716 <T·C> 05:44, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.