Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Rob Matthew Gonzalez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:27, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dr. Rob Matthew Gonzalez

Dr. Rob Matthew Gonzalez (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete. No verification for the notability of this person. Google search for "Rob Matthew Gonzalez" only produces this article. Search for "Rob Gonzalez"+LionsGate does not result in anything relevant. Contested prod. ... discospinster _talk 02:47, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Saw 5 and 6 haven't even been made yet. This is probably a hoax. GlassCobra 02:49, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: With no sources to confirm this stuff, it seems kind of crystal ball-ish. - Rjd0060 04:36, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. No WP:RS. --Evb-wiki 05:48, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete clear case of CRYSTAL and unverifiedBalloonman 05:57, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Clubmarx 06:51, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:CRYSTAL at best, as original prodder. Wizardman 14:26, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, as per WP:CRYSTAL, WP:N, and WP:V. VivioFateFan ^{(Talk, Sandbox)} 17:05, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Although Saw 5 and 6 have been confirmed, the characters themselves have not. Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Icestorm815 19:12, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above, esp. WP:BLP, WP:CRYSTAL, and WP:V. Bearian 00:16, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.