Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Philip J. McMahon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:41, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dr. Philip J. McMahon

Dr. Philip J. McMahon (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

There are zero Ghits for "neuropsychodynamic therapy". The sources are blogspot and myspace. Hoax? There are also only three Ghits for the "renowned" "Genesis Recovery Clinic". Corvus cornix 22:21, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Weak keep - I don't know, he may be notable for something. Cheers, JetLover (talk) 22:23, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
    • Sorry, but that comment doesn't serve any purpose in an AfD discussion. Please point to policies which support your stance. Corvus cornix 22:24, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, changed from weak keep - That was my only reason really. Cheers, JetLover (talk) 22:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Probable hoax. No reputable references or sources to establish notability. --Hdt83 Chat 22:38, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Either a hoax or self-promotion. Realkyhick 22:51, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete obvious hoax. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 22:51, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as possible hoax, didnt fit within speedy.DGG (talk) 23:10, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as spam/vanity/conflict of interest. --Targeman 23:33, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete as spam. This is a thinly veiled attempt at promoting Genesis Consulting (see the links to a Blogspot blog and a Myspace page on the article), and was created by a user similarly named. So tagged. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 01:11, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.