Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Jaishankar Menon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was to keep, and redirect as requested. RyanGerbil10(The people rejoice!) 05:44, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dr. Jaishankar Menon

No vote. Not sure about this one. Is being an IBM Fellow notable enough for inclusion? Redirect to Jaishankar Menon if it is a keeper. Medtopic 00:11, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Probably deleteKeep. --Bigtop (tk|cb|em|ea) 17:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak delete. Only potentially notable achievement is awarding of IBM Fellow, suggesting that this entry be merged there if the award itself is notable. Otherwise, delete. --Alan Au 00:31, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete. Achievements are mentioned, but IMO they are not notable enough. If someone can highlight their importance, I am willing to reconsider my opinion. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 10:02, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep-This article has grown out of stub stage. It lists his various awards, his IBM Fellowship, his important contributions in developing RAID, and his alumnus awards. This has got to be a keeper! Article has also been updated since votes were tallied, take a look at new version and reconsider.Reppin the bay 02:53, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep-I think being one of only 65 active IBM Fellows is enough by itself to call for the keeping of this article...I guess, yeah, being an IBM Fellow IMO, IS notable enough for inclusion49ers14 14:12, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. IBM fellow or not, the list of awards and accomplishments make this a keeper. RFerreira 21:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Notable and accomplished. Aye-Aye 20:19, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.