Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. E. Andrew Boyd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 02:22, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dr. E. Andrew Boyd

Dr. E. Andrew Boyd (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not much more than a resume. Biruitorul 04:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. —David Eppstein 16:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom --Crusio 16:55, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep may meet WP:PROF. JJL 00:04, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
• uncertain He just might do so. It is difficult evaluating academics with careers partly in industry--the distinguishing achievements are not quite as public. His most cited paper is"Assessing faculty financial relationships with industry - A case study" JAMA 284 (17): 2209-2214 NOV 1 2000, Times Cited: 65 according to Web of Science, but only two others are listed there (18, and 7 citations). This would not be enough by itself. DGG (talk) 23:43, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Espresso Addict 02:03, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Marginal claims to notability, very little in the way of reliable sources. --Dhartung | Talk 02:10, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - lack of reliable third party sources about the subject. Burntsauce 22:48, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.