Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas Stevens

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete "just being a bishop is no assertion of notability, just like being a singer alone isn't". -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 07:15, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Douglas Stevens

No assertion of notability, not notable bio. --Gary Kirk (talk) 11:07, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete I don't think just being a Bishop is enough Tom Harrison ^Talk 12:53, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep. I think that being a bishop just scrapes into notability. --Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 13:19, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
• keep as per squiddy Jcuk 13:37, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep all bishops. ReeseM 14:27, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep Minor, but notable figure B.ellis 16:32, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Being a Bishop lends adequate notability. —gorgan_almighty 17:48, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per all. -- JJay 00:11, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
• keep. being bishop is enough. Kingturtle 09:07, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.