Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas Ley
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:14, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Douglas Ley
Non-notable. Neutralitytalk 02:15, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Weak with Ghits . --Brewcrewer 03:28, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Tentative Delete - may not even be the most notable figure with that name (non-trivial secondary sources on the internet seem hard to come by, though this article is not a hoax). I couldn't find what books he's written, they've certainly not reached amazon so he's probably not notable for as a writer of a major book; as an associate professor he doesn't seem to be especially notable within his domain either. The article as it stands doesn't make a sufficiently strong case for his notability and I can find no evidence outside this article for it either. I'll stand corrected if anyone can point out a major book he's written or can explain that he is remarkable within his field e.g. for advancing a new theory. Until then, I think this is better deleted. TheGrappler 03:30, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete but...: Non-notable as it stands currently. Expand upon his works and assert notability and importance, and you can withdraw my deletion. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 04:42, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
