Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Leslie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Doug Leslie

Doug Leslie (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The only aspect of the article that would make this scholar notable is the "Case-File Method" he invented. By the article, this method is controversial; but it also goes completely unsourced. Also, judging by Google, the method is not highly popular outside the professor's department. (There are a number of hits, but only few of them refer to law teaching.) So the subject fails Wikipedia:Notability (academics). Article was on PROD in last August; PROD template removed without comment or discussion. -- Sent here as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 17:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Delete. No ghits indicating mentions in secondary sources. Not notable. Groupthink 18:04, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Delete. Fails WP:Auto. Stellatomailing 18:05, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Delete - It appears to fail WP:COI, WP:BIO, and WP:VERI. --Tλε Rαnδоm Eδιτоr 19:15, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 21:01, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.