Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double seat brief

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. FCYTravis 7 July 2005 01:47 (UTC)

[edit] Double seat brief

I found that an editor named Jasontb had added doubleseat briefs to the underwear article, added a picture of said briefs, set up an article for doubleseat briefs, linked everything to the BVD article, and then inserted a promotional link to Tiger Apparel in the BVD article. Stealth advertising of a particularly noxious kind. I don't see that doubleseat briefs deserve their own article when many other, better-known types don't get an article. If editors want to keep this article, then it's going to have to be stripped of promo material. Zora 1 July 2005 10:13 (UTC)

• Delete agree Jaberwocky6669 July 1, 2005 11:05 (UTC)
• Delete agree with nomination. JamesBurns 2 July 2005 03:46 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.