Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double H

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. howcheng {chat} 17:19, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Double H

No evidence that this is a recognized architectural style. Of the first 30 google hits [1] (discounting Wikipedia) only 1 refers to this. Needs serious work or Delete. Deiz 00:51, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Please also consider what to do with its companion Single H. I would vote to delete that one as well. --Lockley 07:07, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Maybe important for Hong Kong. Both are mentioned at this Hong Kong housing authority site -- Astrokey44|talk 09:42, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Werdna648^T/_C\^@ 12:58, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. There are many other Google references to Double H - but none to do with buildings/architectural design. Also, the Hong Kong Housing Authority website cited above mentions other building 'Block Types' which similarly seem to have no verified use elsewhere. Carbonix 14:34, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delte - Simple. ^KILO-_LIMA 17:07, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable and unverifiable. Stifle 00:00, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.