This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. --Ryan Delaneytalk 05:37, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
Tagged for speedy as "unsuitable for an encyclopedia". That's not a criterion. Abstain. -Splashtalk 23:54, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
Delete neoligism Ryan NortonT | @ | C 00:22, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Neoligism, possible hoax, and surely uncomfortable for both parties. TheMadBaron 02:34, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
Delete, neologism. - Mgm|(talk) 08:51, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
Delete per above. Friday(talk) 15:54, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
Delete per above. Malcolm Morley 04:42, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.