Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double-O-Duck
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to DuckTales. Nothing but unsourced plot summary and trivia at this point. Black Kite 08:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Double-O-Duck
This is the only episode of DuckTales that has its own article (problably). This episode fails Wikipedia:EPISODE. Theres no claim or notability, no real world information, or secondary sources. The article contains a summary and a trivia section, nothing else-- Coasttocoast (talk) 20:30, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect to DuckTales (which was already done and undone, not sure why). Wouldn't be a bad search term as the title of the episode, but not notable enough for its own article. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 22:48, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- I undid it because I saw it was previously redirected and undid. So just to avoid any arguments I decided to bring it here -- Coasttocoast (talk) 23:19, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:29, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable (search term) and even if it was, the DuckTales-editing Wikipedians have not demonstrated a capability to manufacture good articles. –thedemonhog talk • edits 02:53, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, as, seeing as the episode was the inspiration for the entire Darkwing Duck cartoon, I believe that establishes notability. McJeff (talk) 06:06, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
