Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dotcartoon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 22:21, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dotcartoon

This article appears to be about a small web community based on Invisionfree forums. Their claim to fame appears to be a mention on a website with an Alexa ranking of 6.2M. Does not meet WP:WEB. — TheKMan^talk 18:52, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

• Comment I would like to add as a chief administrator of the group, that we are not just a small web based comunity, we are a media group/cult. We do not charge money. More parts of DCUK are under construction, including www.swuk.org, www.dotcartoon.com(pending) so we are definatly not just based on invisionfree, i assume you didnt take proper care when visiting our community. Just a quick scan. Also this is a list about out cartoons, and other things. Our "small community" has been going over 5 years now.

Thankyou! Im going to assume you will revert this as you have everything else, if you are fair and just you will not revert this, and as for evidence i think its only fair ill screen shot this all. Swuk6 19:20, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Advertising, an admittedly small community, a freespace web site, and only EIGHTEEN unique Google hits for "dotcartoon". -- Kicking222 20:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn. Small forum, limited base, invisionfree, no evidence of any particular attention from anywhere. Fan1967 20:03, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable, fails WP:WEB. OhNoitsJamie^Talk 20:32, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom.--Andeh 20:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. —Aiden 21:04, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. We're being fair and just in so far as we're applying Wikipedia guidelines as to notability. With the poorest Alexa rank in an AfD to date, this group doesn't cut it. RGTraynor 21:23, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No doubt they're sincere and dedicated, but that's not enough.--Runcorn 20:06, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.