Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorset Street, London
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Xoloz 14:33, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Dorset Street, London
As with everything else I'm finding whilst cleaning up Category:Streets in London, sending it to AfD instead of prodding as named geographic locations are always contentious. Does a street that no longer exist warrant an article owing to events that happened there? This is a procedural nom to get a community consensus on whether it should be kept, so I abstain — iridescent (talk to me!) 21:29, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Unless someone comes up with more than the Ripper connection. All it needs is a mention on the Ripper page. MarkBul 21:33, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and improve content with descriptions and illustrations of the 1888 geography of the street. MattHucke(t) 21:53, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as independent evidence of notability has not been provided. --Gavin Collins 23:14, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I don't think that a murder case will make this page notable.--JForget 01:25, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - ditto the Ripper connection, though that actually took place in Miller's Court, which would suggest that the latter is the one that needs an article. -- Roleplayer 00:41, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per above as NN crime scene - the crime is notable, but not the scene. Bearian 02:11, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Question Iridescent, could you please give us some idea of where you have already looked so we don't duplicate. I would suggest that perhaps it might have been a better idea to do a smaller number at a time--I want to try to look for famous institutions and residences but I only have time to do one or two in the five days.DGG (talk) 03:25, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Replied on my talk page — iridescent (talk to me!) 19:56, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.