Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorkswithoutfaces

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was consensus to delete. Johnleemk | Talk 02:44, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Dorkswithoutfaces

Non-notable website. The article gets high marks for honesty but low marks for encyclopedic value. The page starts "Dorkswithoutfaces is a little known website". 66.191.124.236 06:32, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Non-notable (aka, Spam). --StuffOfInterest 16:32, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and close Vfd. No claims to notoriety. Article starts with "is a little known website". So unless it has historical importance (first of something, etc) then its a no-brainer to delete it. Don't know why this isn't a reason for Speedy Delete, but so be it. IMO when the article itself admits that its irrelevant, I think it should be able to be deleted on the spot. Just MO. Zordrac 20:06, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete I could not verify any of [[WP::WEB]] suggestions. Nom says it all HackJandy 22:03, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- Dalbury^(Talk) 23:24, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• I Honestly Don't Care I'm the guy who owns the site, I was just told about this thing today by the guy who posted it. Wow, what a pile of crap he wrote. Anyway, do what you want boys & girls, gave me some material to write about today anyway. Although a little commentary, for a site that offers encyclopedia entries for Chat Rooms & a guy who legally changed his name to Optimus Prime because his wife divorced him, it seems highly dubious for you guys to be put in a position where you make that sort of call? Well either way, it's all in good fun! There is quite a lot of interesting stuff to read!
• Comment - true to his word, he wrote an article about wikipedia based on this AFD... Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 19:01, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
• Comment - not sure that I am comfortable with him quoting all of our votes in there, but I suppose its legal for him to do so. He seemed to write about Wikipedia in a positive light at least. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 19:07, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per above. The site is really lame, by the way.  Grue  23:00, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
• Comment FWIW I posted his review in the Wikipedia news section for people to read what seems to be the most positive review of Wikipedia in a long time. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 06:16, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.