Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doosraful

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 10:36, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Doosraful

Doosraful (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

• Delete neologism, only source is some forum chat. Stephen Turner (Talk) 08:01, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
• Strong delete per above. Blnguyen (vote in the photo straw poll) 08:02, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephen Turner (talk • contribs) 08:03, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Stephen Turner (Talk) 08:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
• Note: Google search reveals no results outside Wikipedia and the banglacricket.com forum. Stephen Turner (Talk) 08:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete: until the use of the term is substentiated by other notable media. Arman ^(Talk) 08:47, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as per above reasons. Could probably make a case for it being speedily deleted. Andrew nixon (talk) 09:42, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Not notable. Johnlp (talk) 20:38, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
• It warrants a note on both players' individual articles, and probably on the tour page, but definitely not on its own. Delete. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 08:34, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per the nomination. I got a small chuckle out of reading this "article", but not the good kind. (jarbarf) (talk) 20:35, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.