Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doodleprints

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article has been Speedily Deleted independently of this AFD. - SoM 13:27, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Doodleprints

Non-notable created term. Jake 00:02, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete unless someone can make it an encyclopedic article, which it currently isn't.--MONGO 01:25, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Vanity neologism. --Clay Collier 01:30, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Oh c'mon I use doodleprints all the time. Well, actually I never do. Delete Croat Canuck 01:31, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Doodelete - article itself claims that the term is a neologism. BD2412 T 01:41, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, unencyclopedic. Titoxd^{(?!? - did you read this?)} 01:42, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - neologism. ERcheck 02:34, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, Speedily As per all of the above... --негіднийлють ^{(Reply|Spam Me!*|RfS)} 02:39, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a work of fiction. / Ezeu 03:51, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• DeleteTheRingess 05:46, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.