Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donna & Tom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Kusma (討論) 03:08, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Donna & Tom

If this two are genuine hosts, they don't appear on Google searches - they're not notable enough. As for the album - it doesn't seem genuine. This page doesn't add to Wikipedia - it demeans it. Dmn € Դմն 16:52, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom.--Andeh 18:20, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete hosts of an nn game show on an obscure satelite network, who may be recording an album with no distribution. --djrobgordon 18:25, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete "They may be the next Myspace sensation." Also note that neither is even 18 yet, and none of this seems verifiable, if true. Fan1967 18:51, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, as currently written and without better sources it should be deleted. DrunkenSmurf 20:53, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

1. Donna & Tom are NOT Avago presenters, they are merely linked to it.
2. The album demos can be heard via myspace - it is of parodies, and covers. Perfectly viable.
3. Dmn (aka Madison) has a personal vendetta against me as a user - so I think that he should be disabled for marking my pages for deletion.
4. Also - whoever said neither of us are 18 yet, rubbish. Are you bad at Maths? Donna is 18, and 19 in November, and Tom is 18 in July. HelterSkelter88 23:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete HelterSkelter, I have absolutely no opinion of you whatsoever (I'm sure you're a fine person), and I certainly don't have a vendetta against you. With that said, this article is vanity. These people (you and your friend) are completely non-notable. Having an album on MySpace couldn't possibly mean less- I could very easily record some crap, put it on MySpace, and then write a WP article on myself claiming notability because I'm on MySpace. Because the article is vanity, it's also POV. But above all else, this will be deleted simply because the subject is, in Wikipedia terms, highly insignificant. -- Kicking222 23:52, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Contains elements which are used to promote the article in a vain manner. In addition, lacks any sufficient notability or references.--Auger Martel 07:27, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - it's a vanity piece --Charlesknight 17:01, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.