Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donkey punch (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:03, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Donkey punch (band)

Band fails to meet the notability criteria at WP:MUSIC to the extent that the information in the article allows checking. Delete. —HorsePunchKid→龜 2005-12-07 04:47:14Z

• Yet another argument in favor of pulling the trigger immediately as these band vanity nonsense articles appear. Delete. - Lucky 6.9 05:12, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Every time I come across one of these, I have a little internal debate: Should I just apply {{nn-bio}} and argue that a band is... well, composed of people, at least? Or should I just AfD it and waste everyone's time with the inevitable overhead of voting to delete and closing it out? There seriously needs to be a {{nn-thing}} (and corresponding entry at WP:CSD) that's along the lines of, "It is an article about a real person, band, high school club, neologism, ..., or website that does not assert the significance of the subject." :( —HorsePunchKid→龜 2005-12-07 05:20:07Z

• There's a problem in that because there's some people that take proof existence of something as a claim of notability where others would pull the trigger. It just doesn't work on all things. But I'm pretty sure better tags can be developed for bands as they are basically a group of people we could delete if posted individually. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:01, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
• Excellent idea. How do we get something like this started? These "bandity" articles take up way too much AfD time and space IMO. - Lucky 6.9 00:05, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and agree with the comments on speedy deleting these articles. Stifle 00:20, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• delete per nom.Spearhead 16:01, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.