Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donkachonk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:49, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Donkachonk

Donkachonk (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Non notable neologism, no Ghits. Wikipedia is not for something I made up in school one day. Rockpocket 08:14, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete I've personally NEVER heard the term Donkachonk. Considering there isn't even an entry on UrbanDictionary, where this kind of stuff belongs, I HIGHLY doubt this has any amount of notability deserving of an article, not to mention it seems like wiktionary material anyway. -- feb^talk 08:23, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete because. JuJube 08:48, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and move to BJAODN. --Candy-Panda 08:50, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, I wouldn't say it was worth BJAODN. Also, beware of sock puppets, as they have been used on the article discussion page. J Milburn 12:35, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete not notable. No Google hits outside of Wikipedia [1] and no sources cited. Hut 8.5 15:57, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom _SUBWAYguy 17:24, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Non notable. —dima/s-ko/ 20:24, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as nonsense. Tony Fox (arf!) 04:44, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete As nonnotable (only five links from google, 1 of them Wikipedia) and should possibly go to Wiktionary at most. --Nehrams2020 03:59, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.