Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donk (song)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete per WP:CRYSTAL. PeterSymonds | talk 17:05, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Donk (song)
No sources claiming single; non-notable song Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 22:20, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:NN. --Danreitz (talk) 20:02, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete No proof that it's a single, no reliable sources pertaining to it. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:42, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete no sources for this crystalballing. The song itself is non-notable .--Damiens.rf 23:21, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Can't we just keep it as a song not a single. You people like hate me WTF? Making an account to Wikipedia was a bad choice for me =( User:SPBLU —Preceding comment was added at 01:58, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:NN. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 03:42, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Per WP:BALL. asenine say what? 01:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and WP:CRYSTAL. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 16:35, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:37, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.