Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donier Tyler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


The result was Delete--JForget 23:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Donier Tyler

Donier Tyler (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable actress. A check of the IMDB page linked in the article shows all roles as uncredited. Google brings back hits from various edit-it-yourself movie websites. GlassCobra 11:52, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Update: Creator has tried to blank the page, and has also messed with this AfD. GlassCobra 23:17, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom as non-notable; no major roles. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 13:18, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete if the makers of the films she was supposedly in didn't think she was important enough to be included in the credits, I don't see why we should include her in an encyclopedia. Furthermore, if *every* role was uncredited, I don't see how it would be possible to verify using reliable sources. Might even be a hoax. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:58, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, insufficient notability. NawlinWiki 14:48, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Strong Delete. Career has been primarily at one theater in the Chicago suburbs. Not notable except maybe in theater society in the Chicago suburbs, if even that. --Closeapple 14:59, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
    • Update: Since Yellow85 was so adamant, I did a little more looking. With a little search at Donier Tyler at the Internet Movie Database, it's now clear that this article is WP:Autobiography, which of course makes it WP:COI and all WP:OR also. Definitely non-notable; for example, no sources on the web except her own web page and stock movie credit databases as far as I can see. Absolutely WP:VANITY and appears to exist so that someone can claim they're "on Wikipedia for a reason" to the next sucker just like they're "on imdb for a reason". Anyway, even if it wasn't WP:COI and WP:OR, it's still true that, as Yellow85 said: "you have no idea what she is working on right now" — which means no verifiable evidence of notability from unrelated sources, which means non-notable. --Closeapple 22:32, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
    • And with that last part in mind: now that I think about it, this should have just been speedied as A7 since the facts in the article itself don't even rise to notability. --Closeapple 22:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Try later, when she has been credited! Greswik 17:11, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Her resume lists her as being an extra in one professional movie (The Break Up). The rest is student film and amdram (and she was a game show contestant). I agree with the anonymous contributor above that she is on IMDB for a reason -- probably that she put herself there. Accounting4Taste 17:38, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and re-create and get together and have a laugh about it all in a few months, or when she becomes notable, whichever comes first. Sheffield Steeltalkstalk 18:34, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Do NOT Delete This is not a hoax. I made this page on Donier because she is an up and coming actress who has been in a lot of media here in Chicago. She is not just known for her theater in the suburbs- she has been in many off-broadway productions here in Chicago as well. She has also been in many commercials both local and nation. She has more work than what is credited on imdb, she just has yet to update her page (actually something I am doing for her). And she is huge in the Chicago independent scene. I don't see why all of you are being so snobby about it, she is on imdb for a reason. People can't get on there unless they are reputable actors and actresses. It's actually all kind of funny, because you have no idea what she is working on right now and how big it is going to make her blow up. So go ahead, delete the page... it will make it even funnier when you all have to add her back in a few more months. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yellow85 (talk • contribs) 17:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment Why? It's not difficult to undelete a page. Not sure what you'd be laughing at, but it would be kind of sad. JuJube 07:56, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
  • delete- non-notable/hoax.JJJ999 05:47, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Author blanked the page. JuJube 07:56, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.