Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donic Code

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete due to lack of reliable sources to establish notability. — TKD::Talk 14:50, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Donic Code

Donic Code (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No evidence given that this satisfies Wikipedia's notability guideline for music; it appears to me to be some sort of inside joke. JavaTenor 06:28, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as per WP:MUSIC, is a real band, but non-notable. A quick google search turns up only 30 results, of which 27 of them are from one site (2 are from Wikipedia and 1 is from another site). --Patar knight 22:39, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:BAND. Also obviously a very silly article. DWaterson 22:41, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

As the creator of this page, I can verify all of the content in the article. If you wish I can send you the mp3s of all the songs mentioned. I feel that it is unfair that you have chosen to delete the article because you simply doubt it's legitimacy. I urge you to allow the article to stand, and as I said I am happy to verify the information if you wish. Shogunn1 01:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

I've seen Donic Code live four times, including their controversial performance at the 2006 William and Mary Battle of the Bands, in which they placed second. In the short time they have been around, they have been making noise in the Williamsburg/Newport News hip-hop scene and this article is relevant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.239.197.48 (talk) 13:45, August 29, 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, as per Patar knight. Comment to Shogunn1 -- it's not a matter of the band's existance, it's a matter of meeting the guidelines for inclusion. Please take a minute to thoroughly read the guidelines. --Fabrictramp 13:47, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.