Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dong Wen Jie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete (both) --- Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 20:24, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dong Wen Jie

Dong Wen Jie (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Reads like mild advertising, and doesn't really establish her notability. Unless notability established, delete. --Nlu (talk) 03:31, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following article (for her husband) for deletion:

  • keep both Notability is established by the contents of the article and the links provided. Most bios read like 'mild advertising'; so what? Edit improve articles, not waste our time such such feeble deletion nominations. Hmains (talk) 05:26, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete unless someone can establish notability from an independent reliable source. Sources listed seem to be commercial galleries, who of course stand to profit from making subject seem notable... Deltopia (talk) 13:25, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete: Sure looks like self promotion, with vague terminology about public status. "Many" shows in the continent of North America? That's meaningless. A "leader" in the overseas Chinese art market? Again, this means nearly nothing. Utgard Loki (talk) 14:42, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - lacking reliable sources to establish notability. KnightLago (talk) 17:25, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Although I would really like to see a photo of her work, I think it would help. Golgofrinchian (talk) 22:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. Does not pass WP:BIO. No works held in museum collections, no important exhibitions, no major awards, no multiple third-party sources.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 23:47, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.