Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Trump Rosie O'Donnell Feud

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 03:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Donald Trump Rosie O'Donnell Feud

Donald Trump Rosie O'Donnell Feud (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

personal feelings about Trump aside, let's just say they are not good, I don't feel this is worthy of a stand alone article and feel it is best covered as a side note (if it is covered at all) in the articles on Trump and Rosie. Postcard Cathy 14:48, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. We're not a tabloid or a celebrity watch website - a minor blurb on the article for the involved celebs is more than sufficient. Arkyan • ^(talk) 14:53, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, perhaps speedy. This does not provide a unique resource, nor could it, beyond what is already said in the Trump and O'Donnell articles. It is not particularly encyclopedic. Additionally, it currently stands entirely unreferenced, meaning that it does not comport with WP:BLP (though the relevant portions are referenced in the individuals' respective articles). · jersyko talk 15:23, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: per above. This is a prime example of recentism, and five years from now, no one will give a damn about any of this, if they remember it at all, which they won't.  RGTraynor  15:53, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete - This article was already deleted once Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosie O'Donnell and Donald Trump Controversy and should probably be mentioned at wikinews and not here. Corpx 16:01, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete for all the reasons above. Junk like this doesn't deserve it's own article. --Jacques Pirat ^Talk 16:10, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete - Just add the content to the articles of the people involved.--Fightingirish 21:21, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete this should only be mentionned in Trump's, O'Donnel's and the View's articles.--JForget 00:54, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - as long as the information is covered in the individual articles. No one would search on that awkward title, so there's no reason to repeat the information ina separate article. Tvoz |talk 03:54, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete per nom., and all previous comments.--JayJasper 12:02, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.