Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Scott

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 03:25, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Donald Scott

Delete - this person may have been a Marine but the bio is an obvious lie, the gulf war incident never occured, the 6 purple hearts are also a fallacy. Individual in not notable enought to rate a page. It appears to be a page created by this person as a joke. Google search only shows websites that have scraped from this article.--Looper5920 04:44, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete-i agree with Looper5920, this bio is a definite lie, and seems to be a joke. It makes various fals claims such as "saving 80 Presidental guards". Thetruthbelow 00:46, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - per nom, but was this ever listed on the articles for deletion log? the intial entry is 14 April 2006, and no resolution yet, as of June 1st,2006 --Nobunaga24 01:46, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, hoax. --Terence Ong 03:40, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per al above. Paddles ^T_C 07:11, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Don't they send you home after 3? I agree that this article is probably a hoax. --Rory096 07:43, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• comment I can only find one fallacy for myself - the movie "Heartbreak Ridge" listed TWO people for military tech advisor and military liaison (both uncredited) and neither of them was Scott (see IMDB). There are some odd typoes (how could anyone connected with the military misspell "sergeant"?) and it's called Force Reconnaissance, not Elite Force Reconnaissance. I'm dubious about the article, but I'd like to know where others have documented facts to verify "lies", i.e., what's up with the Purple Hearts? Tychocat 09:36, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per the above comments. Yamaguchi先生 15:51, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.