Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don paterson bedfellows

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Wikipedia ate Matt's homework. ~ trialsanderrors 07:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Don paterson bedfellows

Don paterson bedfellows (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Original research Pigman (talk • contribs) 23:18, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

There is a page on the poet Don Paterson and I'm thinking/assuming "Bedfellows" is one of his poems. I guess there's an outside chance this page could be folded into the poet's page? But I consider the analysis to be original research. --Pigman (talk • contribs) 23:29, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - You consider the analysis to be OR?? The article says "By Matt Smith Age 14" at the end!! Anyway, this should be deleted. Spawn Man 00:55, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I think the editor copied this out of one of those condensed tutorial books, the type that analyses the structure of Romeo and Julet or Prometheus. scope_creep 01:05, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete The 'By Matt Smith Age 14' at the end is classic. --The Way 10:59, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above and WP:NOT a personal webpage host. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 12:52, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Original research? The article is properly referenced by prominent 14-year-old poetry analyst Matt Smith! Delete and comment to teachers: if you're going to let your students do their homework online, make sure they know where to submit it. I can hear it now: instead of the old "my dog ate my homework" line, they'll be saying, "the Wikipedia Afd review deleted my homework!" Wavy G 15:45, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.