Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Chilton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Mr. Lefty (talk) 22:05, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Don Chilton

Political hopeful who satisfies neither WP:BIO nor WP:C&E. Vectro 01:11, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Currently NN. Traces of propaganda.--Húsönd 01:38, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Right now, it doesn't satisfy notability guidelines. Hello32020 02:06, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Has never held political office in the past, nor done anything else notable, according to his own website. If he has not done anything to date notable, then he does not belong here. --Jayron32 04:10, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. TJ Spyke 05:17, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable. Perhpas once he gets elected (if) and does something important. Signature^brendel 07:59, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Madchen Hoch 22:04, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep all articles about major-party candidates for Congress or other offices of that significance. JamesMLane t c 09:39, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per JamesMLane. C&E is neither policy nor guideline. It is a proposal. It is a misguided proposal. He is notable as a major party candidate — not a garage band — so we not focus on self-promotion questions here. Any potential POV issues are vanilla, and should be dealt with as usual, through editing. We can spare the 1K this takes. Fishboy 10:47, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Important Fact Question As of this writing, the article (originally created on Oct 8, 2006) says Chilton "is the current Democratic nominee for Arizona's 4th congressional district seat". But according to here, it appears he lost the primary for Arizona's 3rd congressional district on September 12, 2006. What am I missing? -- 17:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.