Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Domus Pauli
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy G7 by Od_Mishehu. Tevildo (talk) 00:27, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Domus Pauli
Reads like advertising of a church. It was tagged for speedy deletion, but deletion template removed by user. It does not meet notability criteria. NAHID 15:44, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Delete. Google reveals some notability, there might be more outside of the web for a church in Malta; however, just not enough at the moment to warrant a Wiki article. Another option is to remove the advertising and stubbify. Tanthalas39 (talk) 16:04, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- This article isn't about the church. The church is the Collegiate Parish Church of St Paul's Shipwreck. This subject is, apparently, a "few doors away from the church and on the opposite side of the road". Uncle G (talk) 16:21, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed. There are still a few references out there to this 'museum'(?), but you are correct - this makes my vote for deletion stronger. Tanthalas39 (talk) 16:29, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- This article isn't about the church. The church is the Collegiate Parish Church of St Paul's Shipwreck. This subject is, apparently, a "few doors away from the church and on the opposite side of the road". Uncle G (talk) 16:21, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Strong delete advert Thinboy00 @785, i.e. 17:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 00:15, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect. The Collegiate Parish Church of St Paul's Shipwreck would be a suitable target article. However, only content that is independently verifiable from a good source ought to be merged - does the Lonely Planet book have a relevant passage? —Encephalon 13:49, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. The author has blanked the page, so I have put a {db-author} tag on it. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
