Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominik Gigler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, the keep argument does not address the concern provided by the nominator from a policy or guideline standpoint. --Coredesat 08:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dominik Gigler

Dominik Gigler (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

This article meets no notability criteria, does not cite sources, focuses on trivial information, and was quite likely created for self-promotion by User:Dr_dom. Ctu2485 19:52, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Subject does not meet notability standards and the case could be made that, indeed, notability isn't even asserted. Soltak | Talk 22:49, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I would agree that notability is not asserted. Dar-Ape 02:49, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Dominik's primary interest on "our environment and how it shapes the human," which he explores through a unique and compelling style of portrait and documentary photography meets his Bio.DoDoBirds 14:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, and for the curious, DoDoBirds comment is posted from here . Static Universe 19:13, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.