Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dojo Toolkit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was keep. --Sam Blanning(talk) 13:42, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dojo Toolkit

Software, no claim/evidence of notability. --InShaneee 20:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Seems to fail WP:SOFTWARE. I can make a very weak case for it meeting #2 or #3, but, on the whole, delete. –Dicty (T/C) 23:11, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak keep - The name comes up often when the Web2.0 crowd discusses Ajax/JavaScript toolkits. Appears to be used pretty often and has some backers. I have no idea how often it's really used, but I've heard the name often enough to get some gut feeling. At least external-link-worthy somewhere. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 13:14, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I suggest a keep. I work for a MAJOR telecommunications company and after internal review of it and other AJAX type tools it looks like we will be using Dojo as a toolkit for our internal tools. I do not consider Dojo To be trivial. (Actually I believe in 6 to 9 months people will be astonished that this article was once put up for deletion...)—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.248.72.254 (talk • contribs)
  • Keep - Dojo is widely considered one of the top 3 or 4 Javascript toolkits out there. Toohool 21:01, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Dojo is relatively well known as far as these AJAX toolkits go.
  • Keep - Dojo is notable and has recived backing from industry giants. The article is in a bit of a state, but it's not the annoying spiel it started as. Dojo also has loads of "stuff", a monster if you will, it's not just a few small hacks like prototype, moo.fx or something. --Grimboy 23:55, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.