Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doing a Sunderland
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep (no consensus). --Ryan Delaney talk 18:20, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Doing a Sunderland
Obscure; essentially a dictionary definition; unencyclopaedic; the text is POV, the whole subject is inherently POV. --Ngb 16:58, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Dictionary definition at best. Sliggy 17:49, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
- Merge with Sunderland FC, if anything can be salvaged.Allegrorondo 18:16, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
- Probably written by a Newcastle United fan like myself. Let's face it, we haven't much else to celebrate.
DeleteTonywalton 20:11, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
- On reflection, weak Keep. The phrase is in reasonably wide use to mean what the author says it means- this isn't necessarily POV any more than using the phrase "do a Hindenburg" to mean "crash and burn" implies a hatred of hydrogen-filled German dirigble airships. It's more of a dicdef though, really, hence the "weak" bit Tonywalton 20:36, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
- Merge with Sunderland FC as Allegorondo, subject to evidence that the phrase is notable.(Is that how this is meant to be done?)--MarkGallagher 21:06, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Of course it isn't notable. Suggesting it should be merged with the Sunderland article is ridiculous. Sunderland fans would just delete it and they would be quite right to do so. It is simply abusive humour by a fan of a rival club. Osomec 06:14, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. ral315 14:36, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Obvious deletion, for all the reasons mentioned already --Khendon 16:15, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete The phrase will change when the next team to be badly relegated go down e.g. 'do a Swindon' from about ten years ago. Keresaspa 16:00, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep of course, useful content. How this is a dictdef is beyond me. Grue 18:41, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.