Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dogbomb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete Redwolf24 (talk) Attention Washingtonians! 02:19, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Dogbomb

Trivia about a web forum. As with Something Awful, forums should record the fine points of their subculture on their own site, not on Wikipedia. Alexa rank is 445,831.

• Delete. Gazpacho 06:30, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
• Dogbomb is somewhat notable, but this article is apparently an attack on the site, proclaiming it to be dead, but including a link which demonstrates that it isn't.... very strange. Failing an extensive rewrite, Delete. TheMadBaron 07:28, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per TheMadBaron. Karol 11:31, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: It may be notable in a very narrow context, but I don't see its notoriety or notabilty spreading outside of its own participants and adversaries. The article, however, is just a rant, so we're off the hook there. Geogre 13:23, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Anti-tank dog. Sliggy 17:24, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

No, don't redirect. Really, the site has enjoyed widespread media coverage, largely on account of the "people more annoying than Mick Hucknall" thing. As opposed as I am to forumcruft, I think that Dogbomb is a site that probably should be represented on Wikipedia.... just not like this. TheMadBaron 19:14, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.