Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctor Who

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy kept --TimPope 21:43, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Doctor Who

• Delete, Not Notable - 195.93.21.68 20:15, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep, Bad faith AFD. Notability is pretty firmly established in the first paragraph alone.--Sean Black ^{Talk 20:33, 17 October 2005 (UTC)}

• ^{Keep, Clearly notable --Amxitsa 20:55, 17 October 2005 (UTC)}

• ^{Keep, Extremely notable --TantalumTelluride 21:03, 17 October 2005 (UTC)}

• ^{Keep, Extremely notable; I don't exactly see the reason for deletion in the first place. Lady BlahDeBlah 21:11, 17 October 2005 (UTC)}

• ^{Speedy Keep. It's a featured article, for heaven's sake. Bad faith indeed. —Josiah Rowe 21:23, 17 October 2005 (UTC)}

• ^{Speedy Keep. I fail to see a reasoned and salient argument to delete something that has been deemed by Wikipedia to be a featured article. It is absolutely ridiculous that Wikipedian Laws actual allowed this to happen in the first place - HeyWayne ( Talk • Contributions ) 21:30, 17 October 2005 (UTC)}

^{On that subject, Wikipedia:Guide to deletion#Nomination says, "Nominations that are clearly vandalism may be discarded." Doesn't this qualify? —Josiah Rowe 21:36, 17 October 2005 (UTC)}

• ^{Speedy Keep --TimPope 21:38, 17 October 2005 (UTC)}

^{The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.}