Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dnyaneshwar Vidyapeeth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:01, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dnyaneshwar Vidyapeeth

Dnyaneshwar Vidyapeeth (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

NN unrecognised 'university'. Reads like an ad. Was tagged for notability since June. Prod removed without useful comment. Hornplease 07:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - yes, you too can not only get your degree online, but can be a prof too! And, if this is what passes as English at the "university"... SkierRMH,08:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as advertising. JIP | Talk 08:52, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. MER-C 09:00, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - "without useful comment" - bad faith trolling on part of nominator. Bakaman 14:01, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
  • It seems to be a fairly accurate description of the edit summary given on this edit. Uncle G 17:37, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Spammy and no assertion of notability. Prolog 15:04, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
• Comment It has been reported by the Times of India as a "fake university"[1] and yet there's at least some evidence (like a government website[2] - see end of that page) that its training products are accepted in the job market. Either way, I don't see solid evidence of notability. Can Bakasuprman provide anything to help with that? Mereda 17:00, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: I have no opinion on this particular article, but as for the nominator's comment that "Prod removed without useful comment", I need to point out that Hornplease yesterday prodded a significant number of articles (including this one) without giving any prod reason in the template where it belongs, and for the most part with only "prod" as his edit summary (the instructions say "Use an informative edit summary"). I find it annoying when browsing WP:PRODSUM not to be given any substantial reason, or, as in these cases, any reason whatsoever why something is proposed to be deleted. Upp◦land 17:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

I apologise for inconveniencing you. Please note that all the articles I prodded, as a glance at any of them would have confirmed, had notability templates on them since June. I thought no further comment was required; I never use the bot myself. Hornplease 17:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. --Gabi S. 16:38, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per the person with the script handrwriting FirefoxMan 16:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• DELETE per the first external link in the article - its under investigation as a fake university. Yet the POV (and rough English) in the article trys to sell it as a bonafide university. and who will type in the search window:Dnyaneshwar Vidyapeeth ~ yikes SweetGodiva 22:47, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.