Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dj BC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP —Whouk (talk) 10:09, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dj BC

Non-notable DJ. Only has one album, self-released, and most of it has "been removed". Naconkantari e|t||c|m 21:21, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

• delete Does not meet notability criteria. Alternative newspapers don't count for notability. Also, I'm not comfortable with JPG images of articles. Bastique▼^parler_voir 21:24, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Newsweek and Rolling Stone are alternative newspapers? --Nick Catalano _contrib ^talk 19:32, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Added Boston Globe link --Nick Catalano _contrib ^talk 23:54, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep Passes WP:MUSIC for notability, only one CD which was available for download, as many mash-ups are (see The Grey Album)... check his site, there is more than just that one "CD" Nick Catalano _contrib ^talk 21:25, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - as per above. Another reason why notability is subjective, POV, and should not be used as a criteria for inclusion in or deletion from Wikipedia. DanielZimmerman 19:54, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• Ditto - as above - I'm surprised this is being debated: I did a degree in Music Tech and at the time DJ BC was considered very notable indeed. Bishely 17:26, 19 May 2006 (BST)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.