Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divine incantations scripture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was I can't think of anything witty to go here, but keep anyway. --Luigi30 (Taλk) 13:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Divine incantations scripture

Divine incantations scripture (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Smells fishy to me. I suspect a hoax here, though I can't prove it. thadius856_{talk|airports|neutrality} 04:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

• I would tend toward keep and cleanup - as it is, it's just an OR interpretation of a primary source, but it doesn't necessarily seem like a hoax and if more references could be found that would be helpful.-Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 04:48, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Cleanup and keep. Apparently part of the Taoist canon. --N Shar 05:50, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

• another source: [1]. This is a Google HTML version of a VERY LARGE pdf file. Minimal information, trivial coverage -- but not a hoax. Academic sources are needed. --N Shar 05:59, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

• Is this distinctive enough from the Taoist canon to have its own article? Either Keep if yes, or Merge and Redirect if not. --Dennisthe2 06:21, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• cleanup and keep That the nominator was able to think it a hoax is testimony to the lack of context provided--the article needs further elucidation for the general readerDGG 04:49, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per above. --MaNeMeBasat 15:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.