Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divadog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:08, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Divadog

Divadog (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

A confused, unencyclopedic article about a term that is not in use. Fails WP:N. The bulk of the article concerns the career of its creator, Denise Kimball. The creation of User:Lemonpoppy, a single purpose user. Victoriagirl 02:46, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - Appears to be a Neologism, and Wikipedia is not a dictionary. -wizzard2k ^(C•T•D) 03:05, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete strong COI, non-notable person and brand - obscure neologism Bigdaddy1981 04:01, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - per my nomination. Victoriagirl 16:06, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Comment - I note that User:Lemonpoppy has made a series of edits in the interests of addressing the neologism issue. If I understand the recent talk page post correctly, the article is now about Divadog as a brand. Unfortunately, at this stage neither Divadog not its creator Denise Kimball appear to meet WP:N guidelines. Victoriagirl 16:59, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.